Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi Diddle Riddle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Diddle Riddle

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Hi Diddle Riddle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page talks about the first episode of the series, consisting only in plot and curiosity. There is not even a single source and I was not able to find reliable sources about this single episode Redjedi23 (talk) 09:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Television, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep I see a number of secondary sources of varying length and quality. I think The Batman Filmography, 2d ed., p. 63-64, 67, and The Caped Crusade: Batman and the Rise of Nerd Culture, p. 76, 80-83 would be a fine basis for an improved article. Those sources do talk about the two-part pilot collectively a lot, so I could imagine a merge with Smack in the Middle into one article. Daranios (talk) 19:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
• PLEASE KEEP IT OTHERWISE REDIRECTED IT Secondary source detected. See above. 124.217.24.220 (talk) 10:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
• Weak redirect, leaning keep. Right now this is just plot summary and catalogue info, but sources found by Daranios could be used to rescue this. Sadly, I am only getting snippet view so I can't confirm that there's enough analysis to meet SIGCOV; ping me if the article is improved or if someone can comment on SIGCOV or find better sources. Certainly do not delete. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}`

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.