Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCARED!
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 21:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- SCARED! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:N. Professionally written but inappropriate self-publicity for a local (Staten Island) community cable show. LuckyLouie (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A regretful Delete - Professional grade PEG programming - which IMHO should be a ground for notability; this level of quality is very rare on community access ;) That being said, high production values does not equal notability for Wikipedia's purposes, nor does it make up for a lack of third party, non-trivial coverage. If this program ends up getting a wider audience via the web, it has the potential for becoming notable but Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball. We have articles on people, places, events, and things that are already notable, not on subjects that might be notable someday. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 15:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 06:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Community televtision shows aren't notable. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 16:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable local programming. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.